Aren’t all relationships, though? Be them considered official marriages, or just long term relationships?
This reminds me I still need more time … or a boy who is very, very, very adventurous … whatever that means.
ronenreblogs: via sherry:unburyingthelead
-
dariuscaine liked this
-
somethingbysomeone liked this
-
ronen liked this
-
derica liked this
-
smutandeggs reblogged this from ronenreblogs and added:
Aren’t all relationships, though? Be them considered official marriages, or just long term relationships? This reminds...
-
smutandeggs liked this
-
thornsandwiltingroses liked this
-
silver-age liked this
-
agglesauce liked this
-
dark-raven liked this
-
hungryghoast liked this
-
petersantiago liked this
-
rememo liked this
-
jiggabits liked this
-
benjaminhilts said:
Bitter, party of one. Your table is ready.
-
writer-b liked this
-
wolfandfox said:
He never seems very happy, does he?
-
hatethefuture liked this
-
andrewfm said:
Being a human convention, a wedding doesn’t necessarily have to be repressive, emancipatory, fulfilling, or anything else. So no.
-
oversets posted this
